Sugerencias
Estadísticas
SuscripciónNúmeros Publicados > Listado por Autor
| Pulse sobre el autor para ver el resumen del artículo. Pulse sobre la referencia para ir al artículo directamente. |
José Molina Mateo
José M. Meseguer-Dueñas, Ana Vidaurre, José Molina Mateo, Jaime Riera y Rosa Martínez Sala
Volumen 5, Número 2 Pags. 70-75
Title- Validation of student peer assessment in effective oral communication in engineering degrees.
Abstract- Peer assessment is a form of collaborative learning in which the students evaluate learning products of other students. In this paper we present the results of the analysis of the assessment between students of oral presentations. A group of students solves a problem, writes a document with the resolution and makes an oral presentation in class for the rest of the students. Another group assesses both, the written document and the oral presentation. To help students to do the assessments two rubrics are provided along with other guidance documents which help in writing scientific documents and performing oral presentations. Regarding the oral communication, the rubric evaluates 5 factors. The result of the students’ evaluation is compared with the simultaneous evaluation of two professors. When making a comparison of the global assessment between professors and students we find significant differences. However, when the factor “use of auxiliary resources” is removed these differences disappear, since that factor introduces dispersion difficult to be justified. In addition, the assessment performed by students with and without the help of a rubric is compared. In this case we do not find significant differences.
Index Terms- collaborative learning, team work, effective oral communication, peer assessment